Legal Opinion
Intermedics Infusaid, Inc. And the Infusaid Company v. The Regents of the University of Minnesota
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 22, 1986No. 85-2811PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Circuit Judge.
Intermedies Infusaid, Inc., and The Infusaid Company appeal from the August 22, 1985, orders of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Tauro, J.), (1) denying Intermedies’ motion to enjoin an action between the parties in a Minnesota state court and (2) granting a motion to stay the action before the federal district court. We affirm.
I
In May, 1973, United States Patent No. 3,731,681, issued to a group of employees of the University of Minnesota, with the University named as assignee. The patent discloses and claims an implantable drug infusion…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kershner v. MazurkiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Helifix Limited v. Blok-Lok, Ltd. And William Scott Burns v. Helifix North America Corporation, Third Party CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Micro Motion, Incorporated v. Kane Steel Co., Inc., Cross/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,913 Asset Allocation and Management Company v. Western Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Katz v. Lear Siegler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Murata MacHinery USA, Inc. v. Daifuku Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.