Waples v. Yi
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.
¶1 — This case involves a challenge to the constitutionality of former RCW 7.70.100(1) (2006),1 which requires a plaintiff to provide health care providers with 90 days’ notice of the plaintiff’s intention to file a medical malpractice suit. This notice requirement is one of two requirements instituted by the legislature in an effort to provide potential medical malpractice plaintiffs with incentives to settle cases before resorting to court. The second, codified as RCW 7.70.150, required plaintiffs to obtain and file with the complaint a certificate of merit from a medical expert. We…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carrick v. LockeWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- John Doe v. Puget Sound Blood CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Hale v. Wellpinit School Dist. No. 49Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Hale v. Wellpinit School District No. 49Washington Supreme Court · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Utter v. Building Industry Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Avellaneda v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Avellaneda v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Lee v. Metro Parks TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- McDevitt v. Harborview Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.