Hale v. Wellpinit School Dist. No. 49
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
198 P.3d 1021 (2009)
John L. HALE and Robbin Hale, husband and wife, Petitioners,
v.
WELLPINIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 49, a municipal corporation, Respondent.
No. 80771-0.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued October 21, 2008.
Decided January 15, 2009.
Paul James Burns, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Petitioners.
Michael Early McFarland Jr., Patrick Mark Risken, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
Sean M. Phelan, Frank Freed Subit & Thomas, LLP, Seattle, WA, Amicus Curiae on behalf of Washington Employment Lawyers Association.
Michael Craig Subit, Beth A. Bloom, Sean M. Phelan, Frank…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical Center, PSWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- SCHOOL DISTRICTS'ALLIANCE v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Department of Social & Health Services v. LuakWashington Supreme Court · 2012
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.