Legal Opinion

Lee v. Metro Parks Tacoma

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 7, 2014No. 44705-3-IIPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaxa, J.

¶[1 Christine Lee appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing her claims against Metro Parks Tacoma based on her failure to wait 60 days after presenting a tort claim to Metro Parks before filing suit, in violation of RCW 4.96.020(4). Lee argues that she substantially complied with the 60-day waiting period. We hold that the legislature has now directed that strict compliance with the 60-day waiting period is not required and that substantial compliance will be sufficient. But we disagree that Lee substantially complied with RCW 4.96-.020(4) under the facts of this case,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Jametsky v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of SantoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. A.T. v. Everett Sch. Dist.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
  2. Roff And Bobbi Arden, V Forsberg Umlauf, PsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. James And Laura Walsh, V Ronald HalmeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. In re C.V.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. Alex Luciano Beyhawck v. Washington State Patrol et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API