Legal Opinion

Avellaneda v. State

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 27, 2012No. 41060-5-IIPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.

¶1 Flor Avellaneda was seriously injured when two cars crossed the median on state route (SR) 512 and one of them struck her car. Flor1 and her husband, Alvaro Avellaneda, sued the State, alleging that the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) negligently failed to timely install a barrier on the SR 512 median. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the State on the basis of discretionary immunity. The Avellanedas appeal, arguing (1) the State was not entitled to discretionary immunity and (2) genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment. We affirm…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Evangelical United Brethren Church v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Ranger Ins. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Miller v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Greensun Group Llc v. City Of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Stephen Kerr Eugster v. Washington State Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. Diane Christian, et ux v. Antoine Tohmeh, MD, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Fabre v. Town of RustonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API