Legal Opinion

ZF Micro Devices v. TAT Capital Partners

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 2016No. H040776MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 11/30/16 Unmodified version attached CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ZF MICRO DEVICES, INC. et al., H040776 (Santa Clara County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. 109CV134970) v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION TAT CAPITAL PARTNERS, LTD., et al., Defendants and Respondents. NO CHANGE IN THE JUDGMENT THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on November 3, 2016, be modified as follows: 1. On page 8, third full paragraph, first sentence, delete “because of the delayed accrual of the statute of limitations”…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API