Legal Opinion
Waco Artesian Water Co. v. Cauble
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 26, 1898PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error from McLennan. Tried below before Hon. Sam. R. Scott.
1Opinion of the Court
COLLARD, Associate Justice.
The plaintiff in error makes a correct statement of this case, as follows:
“On September 1, 1896, C. M. Cauble filed this suit against William B. Hord for $2124.30, damages to 262 head of his cattle, alleging that Hord was engaged in supplying water for pay to persons residing in Waco and McLennan County, and that his feeding pens were supplied with pipes, troughs, etc., and connected with Hordes mains. That he placed 262 head of cattle in said pens in Waco, to feed and fatten them for market, and about February 1, 1896, made a contract with Hord to furnish water for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cooper v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Houston, East & W. Tex. R'y Co. v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Austin & Northwestern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Fowler v. WallerTexas Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by11 opinions
- Morgan v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Hoehne Ditch Co. v. John Flood Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Berkley v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. WordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. of Texas v. McCunninghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.