Legal Opinion

Cooper v. City of Dallas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1892No. 3241PublishedCited by 31 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HEFRY, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought by the appellant to recover damages caused by an overflow of his premises. The case is presented to us upon the following agreed statement:

“Said waters were caused to flow upon said lands, first on April 23 and then on the 24th, 1887, by the city of Dallas, in the exercise of its authority conferred upon it by its charter, by grading and paving Elm Street and Preston Street, the grade of said streets being thereby raised higher than the adjacent lands and the lands of the plaintiff, 'and by reason of the insufficiency of the sewer laid by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. 1Texas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Powell v. Houston & Texas Central RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. O'MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Blair v. WaldoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API