Legal Opinion
Holmstrom v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 31, 2009No. 07-CV-6044PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT M. DOW, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff Lanette Holmstrom (“Holmstrom”) filed a complaint initiating this action against Defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Met Life”) and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Employee Welfare Benefit Plan (collectively “Defendants”). Defendants terminated Plaintiffs long term disability (“LTD”) benefits and Plaintiff seeks review of that decision pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq. In addition to its answer, Met Life filed a one count counterclaim…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holmstrom v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Cusson v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Solomon v. Metropolitan Life InsurnaceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- DeBenedictis v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- D & H Therapy Associates, LLC v. Boston Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2010