Legal Opinion

DeBenedictis v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 15, 2010No. 2:07-cv-02561PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

H. RUSSEL HOLLAND, District Judge.

Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment. 1 This motion is opposed, 2 and defendant cross-moves for summary judgment. 3 Defendant’s cross-motion is opposed. 4 Oral argument was not requested and is not deemed necessary.

Background

Plaintiff is Joseph DeBenedictis. Defendant is Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company.

Plaintiff began working for U.S. Bank on February 1, 2001 and became eligible for coverage under the U.S. Bancorp Long Term Disability Plan on March 1, 2001. U.S. Bank’s LTD plan was initially self-funded,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Epolito v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
  2. Filarsky v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. Mayhew v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API