Solomon v. Metropolitan Life Insurnace
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) and Oxford Health Plans, Inc. (“Oxford”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Tracy Solomon (“Solomon” or the “Plaintiff’) and granting their cross counterclaim seeking recovery of benefits paid. Solomon has cross-moved under the same rule for summary judgment granting her the relief she has sought under the Oxford Employee Welfare Plan (the “Plan”) and dismissing Defendants’ counterclaim. Upon the findings and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Topalian v. Hartford Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- In Re CohenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Kagan v. Unum ProvidentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Shao-Hui T. Kao v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Hughes v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.