Legal Opinion
Tracy v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 21, 2003No. 01-541CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
This contract action is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Plaintiff, a former United States Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) informant, claims that he was promised by the government, in return for the information he provided, a certain percentage of the value of any property seized as a result of that information. He asserts that he is entitled to relief because the government failed to compensate him as promised. Defendant denies that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jumah v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- SGS-92-X003 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Aboo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Telenor Satellite Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Monument Realty LLC v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.