Legal Opinion

Hernke v. Northern Insurance Co. of New York

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1963PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

There are five principal issues presented by this appeal. They will be considered separately.

1. The Plaintiff s Negligence.

The plaintiff argues that there is no basis for finding any negligence on his part. The plaintiff contends that he was not negligent as a matter of law. Specifically, he urges that the jury’s finding that he was 30 percent negligent as to lookout is untenable.

Mr. Hernke testified as to the great care with which he observed the movements of Mrs. Last’s automobile, and he also testified as to the movements of his automobile in the intersection. If the jury believed his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Block v. Milwaukee Street Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Reynolds v. Madison Bus Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State Ex Rel. Isham v. MullallyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Lisowski v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Michalski v. WagnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lutz v. Shelby Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Betchkal v. WillisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. O'Riley v. RogersSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  4. Roy v. St. Lukes Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  5. Peil v. KohnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API