Legal Opinion

Roy v. St. Lukes Medical Center

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 5, 2007No. 2006AP480PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURLEY, PJ.

¶ 1. Sharon Roy appeals from an order for judgment entered after a jury found that Shekhar Sane, M.D., an interventional radiologist, was not negligent during an angiogram procedure that he performed on her. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in allowing Dr. Sane, his employer, Milwaukee Radiologists, Ltd., and their insurer, the Medical Protective Company (collectively referred to as Dr. Sane), to play two video animations for the jury, which purported to depict both parties' theories of the events that transpired during the angiogram procedure. Roy contends that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  2. Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. WalstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Tamminen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Austin v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Friends of Frame Park, U.A. v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Benkendorf v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists CharteredCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. State v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
  4. 260 North 12th Street, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  5. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API