Legal Opinion

Kay v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 15, 1994No. CA CR 93-576PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

Leonard Kay appeals from his conviction at a bench trial of driving while intoxicated, second offense. He contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the results of a breathalyzer test given at the direction of the arresting officer. We affirm.

Prior to his trial, appellant moved to exclude evidence of the breathalyzer test on grounds that the officer had failed to advise appellant of his right to an additional test and to assist him in obtaining such a test as required by Ark. Code Ann. § 5-65-204(e) (Repl. 1993). That section provides:

The person…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Hegler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Girdner v. City of KensettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Scalco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  5. McEntire v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mhoon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Ebel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Lampkin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API