Ebel v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
RITA W. GRUBER, Judge.
| Appellant Christopher David Ebel appeals from a conviction for driving while intoxicated, second offense. Appellant’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion in limine to exclude the results of a breathalyzer test because the arresting officer did not allow appellant to have an additional, independent blood test administered. We affirm appellant’s conviction.
Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-65-204(e) (Repl.2005) provides as follows:(e)(1) The person tested may have a physician or a qualified technician, registered nurse, or other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mhoon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Kay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
3Cited by1 opinion
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015