Legal Opinion

Ebel v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 29, 2014No. CR-14-109PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge.

| Appellant Christopher David Ebel appeals from a conviction for driving while intoxicated, second offense. Appellant’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion in limine to exclude the results of a breathalyzer test because the arresting officer did not allow appellant to have an additional, independent blood test administered. We affirm appellant’s conviction.

Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-65-204(e) (Repl.2005) provides as follows:(e)(1) The person tested may have a physician or a qualified technician, registered nurse, or other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mhoon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Kay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Briggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API