Legal Opinion

Hegler v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 10, 1985No. CR 84-185PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The appellant was found guilty of a second violation of the Omnibus DWI Act of 1983. The judgment of the prior conviction does not reveal whether appellant was represented by counsel. Appellant contends that the trial court should not have admitted the judgment of prior conviction into evidence. He is correct. A prior conviction cannot be used collaterally to impose enhanced punishment unless the misdemeanant was represented by counsel or validly waived counsel, and waiver of counsel may not be presumed from a silent record. Lovell v. State, 283 Ark. 425, 678 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lovell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Sparrow v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Spicer v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Green v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Fiegel v. City of CabotCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Qualls v. City of ClarksvilleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API