Legal Opinion

Lampkin v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 23, 2003No. CA CR 02-940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

This is an appeal from a DWT conviction after a bench trial. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to strike evidence of a breathalyzer test because the police failed to provide him with reasonable assistance in obtaining an additional test. We find no error, and we affirm.

Arkansas Code Annotated § 5-65-204(e) (Supp. 2001) establishes the right of a person tested for alcohol content at the direction of a law enforcement officer to have an additional test performed as follows:(e)(1) The person tested may have a physician or a qualified…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Hegler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Kay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Fiegel v. City of CabotCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daniels v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API