Chisholm v. Diamond Condominium Construction

MARTIN, Judge.

Plaintiff presents two issues in this appeal arguing that the Industrial Commission erred in its application of G.S. 97-47 to his claim and in its failure to make findings of fact and conclusions of law before denying his motion for hearing to take additional evidence. Upon review of the record, we find no error in the Commission proceedings and affirm its Opinion and Award denying plaintiffs claim.

Plaintiff first contends that the Industrial Commission misapprehended the applicable law in denying his claim, and erroneously applied the “change of condition” standards contained…