Legal Opinion
Pomeroy v. Tanner Masonry
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided July 2, 2002No. COA01-505PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Tanner Masonry (Employer) and USF&G Insurance (collectively, Defendants) appeal from a 19 December 2000 opinion and award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission (the Commission). Specifically, Defendants contend the Commission erred in concluding that Daniel Pomeroy (Plaintiff) is “entitled to reasonably necessary medical treatment related to his compensable injury by accident for so long as such treatment tends to effect a cure, provide relief or lessen the period of disability.” Plaintiff likewise appeals from the Commission’s 19 December 2000 opinion and award,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Kisiah v. W.R. Kisiah Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wilkes v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Eudy v. Michelin North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Taylor v. Bridgestone/FirestoneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Miller v. Carolinas Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Lewis v. Transit Mgmt. Of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.