Lattin v. Hazard
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment against them on demurrer to their complaint. It is their second appeal, the former (85 Cal. 58) being from a similar judgment. The complaint was amended so as to avoid the defect then pointed out, and is now questioned upon other grounds.
The action is to enforce specific performance of an *89agreement between James McLoughlin, as party of the second part, and a number of persons who apparently owned, severally, various tracts of land in Los Angeles or the vicinity. Some of them agree to convey to him certain lands, and to give him the right of way for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vassault v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Cooper v. PenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Lattin v. HazardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Los Angeles & Bakersfield Oil & Development Co. v. Occidental Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Pacific Etc. Ry. Co. v. Campbell-JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Knudtson v. RobinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Morris v. IdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.