Legal Opinion
Morris v. Iden
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 29, 1913No. Civ. No. 1137PublishedCited by 11 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County and from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. J. A. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in- the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff "from a judgment entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
The complaint, which is verified, alleges that the defendant, W. A. Iden, and one G. S. Mattos, on the eleventh day of July, 1912, at the county of Tulare, state of California, entered into the following agreement:
“Tulare, California, 7-12-12.
“This Agreement made and entered into this 11th day of July, 1912.
“Between W. A. Iden of Tulare, California; the party of the first part, and G-. S. Mattos of Tulare, California; the party of the second part, witnesseth:
“That G. S. Mattos is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte WarfieldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Vassault v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Schmaltz v. York Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Kellogg v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Gallagher v. Equitable Gas Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beckett v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bachenheimer v. Palm Springs Management Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Baranov v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Lichty v. Model HomesWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.