Legal Opinion

Nielsen v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1961PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The sole question for determination is whether there exists a presumption that an unexplained fall of an employee on the employer’s premises arises out of the employment. This question has not heretofore been decided by this court, but was pointed out and reserved for future decision in Peterson v. Industrial Comm. (1955), 269 Wis. 44, 68 N. W. (2d) 538.

It is, of course, elementary the applicant has the burden of proving all the facts essential to the recovery of compensation, and if the applicant fails to meet such burden of proof, the commission has the duty to deny the application.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Unruh v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Van Roy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Fitz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hansen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Beem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Goranson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Slimfold Mfg. Co. v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Whitehurst v. Rainbo Baking CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lewellyn v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Van Valin v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API