Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Kidd

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1939No. Civil No. 4090PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— R. F. Kidd, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit on behalf of himself and some thirty-five other persons who had assigned their claims to him for wages which he alleges is due to him and his assignors from the City of Phoenix, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called defendant. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff in the superior court, and this appeal was taken.

The appeal involves a consideration of section 1350, Revised Code 1928, as amended by chapter 12, Regular Session 1933, commonly known as the Minimum Wage Law. The facts have been stipulated, and we summarize them so…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JaastadArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Bank of Lowell v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Palmcroft Development Co. v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State of Arizona v. AngleArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. City of Phoenix v. SittenfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Tucson Sunshine Climate ClubArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Town of Gila Bend v. Walled Lake Door CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Mayor Common Council of City of Prescott v. RandallArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Pima County v. GrossettaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Local Union No. 876, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. State Labor Mediation BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API