State v. Rubek
Nebraska Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Sievers, Judge.
In a question of first impression, we decide whether in a prosecution for violation of a protection order, second offense, the State’s burden of proof includes proof of the first violation of the same order. Russell M. Rubek, Sr., was charged in the district court for Sarpy County with violation of a protection order, second offense, and with being a habitual criminal. See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 42-924(3) (Reissue 1998) and 29-2221 (Reissue 1995). After the State presented its case against Russell, the trial court sustained Russell’s motion for a directed verdict and dismissed the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Levell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RodriguezNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. BretNebraska Supreme Court · 2025
- Fjellin v. PenningDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2014