Legal Opinion
Dauven v. U.S. Bancorp
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 13, 2019No. 3:18-cv-01637-ACPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL W. MOSMAN, Chief United States District Judge
On April 11, 2019, Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued his Findings and Recommendation (F&R) [16], recommending that I GRANT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [8]. Neither party objected.
*1268DISCUSSION
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Barefield v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Bilbruck v. Valley CountyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2024
- Bondick v. Cambridge Real Estate Services, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2022
- Cohen v. RussellDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
- Ditech Holding CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.