Legal Opinion
Frost v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 26, 1994No. Nos. 141, 143PublishedCited by 148 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
The primary issue presented in these two consolidated appeals is whether Maryland Code (1957, 1993 Repl-Vol.), Article 41, § 4-612(e),1 as applied to the appellants, violates the ex post facto clauses of the United States and Maryland constitutions. See U.S. Constitution, Article I, § 10, cl. 1; Maryland Declaration of Rights, Article 17. Section 4-612(e) provides as follows: “Revocation—Rescission of diminution credits.—The Parole Commissioner presiding may rescind all diminution credits previously earned on the sentence or any portion thereof in the revocation proceedings.”
*128I.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Walzer v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.