Legal Opinion

State v. . Woodward

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

INDICTMENT for forcible trespass, tried before Coble, J., and a jury, at August Term, 1896, of Duplin Superior Court. The defendant was convicted and appealed. The facts appear in the opinion of Associate Justice Fukoiies.

1Opinion of the Court

Fueohes, J.:

The defendant is indicted for forcible trespass in tearing down and moving the prosecutor’s steam sawmill. The mill was standing on land upon which the defendant had a lease. But it was put there with the consent of the defendant and under a contract between him and the prosecutor that he, the defendant, was to log the mill and the prosecutor was to saw the logs at specified prices. The prosecutor had quit sawing on Thursday before the mill was torn down Wednesday morning following, and was not present when the defendant and his force entered and commenced tearing down the mill.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . McAddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. State v. . GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. State v. WebsterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. State v. . StinnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. State v. . LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API