Legal Opinion

State v. . Stinnett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1933PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

The agent of an automobile finance corporation, the owner and holder of a conditional sales contract covering a truck, observes the purchaser of the truck, who is in default, leave the truck in a public street in front of his residence and go into his home. Thereupon the agent steps into the truck and drives it away to a garage and proposes to hold the same for the finance company until the balance in default is paid. The foregoing fact-status produces this question of law: Does such act of the agent constitute larceny or criminal trespass as defined and contemplated by law?

The trial judge…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. . HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. State v. . LaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Jackson v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. State v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1830

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. McCrarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Freeman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Grier v. . WeldonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API