Legal Opinion

State v. Webster

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1897PublishedCited by 16 opinions

INDICTMENT for forcible trespass, tried before Allen, J., and a jury at Spring Term, 1897, of Chatham Superior Court. The facts appear in the opinion. The defendants were convicted and appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Douglas, J.:

This is a criminal action charging the three defendants with forcible entry and trespass. There was a verdict of guilty as to two of the defendants, third defendant not having been taken. The convicted defendants appealed, assigning as error the exclusion of certain testimony tending to show title in the defendants, and for the refusal of the Court “to give the instructions he asked, and for instructions given.” We think that the defendants' prayers for instruction ' which were not given by the Court, were properly refused; and we cannot consider the “broadside exception” to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . McCaulessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849
  2. Hampton v. Norfolk & Western RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. State v. . McAddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. State v. . WoodwardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. State v. ClyburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API