Legal Opinion
Thompson v. City of La Mesa
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1935No. Civ. 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Petitioner has applied for a writ of mandate to compel respondents to pay available funds in its treasury into a bond redemption fund, with which to pay delinquent interest and principal on street improvement bonds, or, to levy a tax to raise sufficient money with which to pay delinquencies. An alternative writ of mandate was issued commanding respondents to pay $11,302.40 into such bond redemption fund, or, failing to have such funds available in the city treasury, to levy a tax tc pay the delinquent principal and interest on the bonds. Respondents demurred to the petition and filed an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Southern California Roads Co. v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Union Safe Deposit Bank v. City of Menlo ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Greene v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Griffith Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Hammond v. City of BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Union Safe Deposit Bank v. City of ClovisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Thompson v. City of ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936