Legal Opinion

Griffith Co. v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1935No. S. F. 15423PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel respondents to transfer money from the county treas ury to the bond redemption fund to meet unpaid instalments of principal and interest on improvement bonds. The facts and issues in this proceeding are substantially similar to those presented in Southern California Roads Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo, L. A. No. 15142 (ante, p. 220 [48 Pac. (2d) 34]), and Sawyer v. County of San Luis Obispo, L. A. No. 15178 (post, p. 776 [48 Pac. (2d) 35]), this day decided The only difference is that in the instant ease a special tax was actually levied…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southern California Roads Co. v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Hammond v. City of BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Thompson v. City of La MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Union Safe Deposit Bank v. City of ClovisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Thompson v. City of ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API