Legal Opinion

Southern California Roads Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1935No. L. A. No. 15142PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel respondents to levy a tax to pay principal and interest on bonds of an improvement district.

*221In 1930, by resolution of the board of supervisors of respondent county, bonds were authorized under the County Improvement Act of 1921 and the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, to pay for improvement of streets in said county, all of which were dedicated to the county as public highways. Petitioner acquired a number of these bonds, and to-day holds coupons representing unpaid instalments of principal and interest. Demand has been made for payment, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. American Securities Co. v. ForwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Union Safe Deposit Bank v. City of Menlo ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Greene v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Hammond v. City of BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. McGrath v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Griffith Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API