Legal Opinion
Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. City Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 1936No. Civ. No. 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
In this proceeding the petitioner seeks to compel the respondents to revise a tax levy for the fiscal year 1936-1937, which is claimed to be in excess of that permitted by the act of June 25, 1935, imposing a limitation on expenditures by cities and other political subdivisions (Stats. 1935, p. 1254).
The petitioner alleges that the respondent city council on August 6, 1936, acting under an "appropriate ordinance of the City of Seal Beach, adopted a budget for said city for the fiscal year 1936-1937 and thereby appropriated the several sums therein set forth to the respective purposes and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Southern California Roads Co. v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Union Safe Deposit Bank v. City of Menlo ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Thompson v. City of La MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Holmes Investment Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- Saunders v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949