Chandler v. Hyundai Motor Co.
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We consider the appropriate appellate remedy concerning a trial court’s order limiting the public disclosure of certain documents.
In the underlying suit, Chloe Chandler alleged that a defective rear seat belt was a producing cause of her daughter’s death in a Hyundai Excel. She obtained discovery from Hyundai of a number of documents relating to the design and manufacture of the seat belt system. When Hyundai sought a protective order limiting the dissemination of this information to anyone not involved in this particular case, Chandler sought a hearing pursuant to Rule 76a, Texas Rules of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davenport v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- General Tire, Inc. v. KeppleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Icon Benefit Adminstrators II, L.P. & American Administrative Group Inc v. Joella Mullin, Stanley Self, Andrea Davenport,et Al, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
- Marks v. Feldman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
- General Tire, Inc. v. Kepple Ex Rel. Kepple, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.