Legal Opinion
General Tire, Inc. v. Kepple Ex Rel. Kepple
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided March 28, 1996No. 14-94-01166-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEE, Justice.
General Tire, Inc. appeals a determination by the trial court that documents presented during discovery are not entitled to protection under rules of civil procedure 166b or 76a. General Tire brings six points of error challenging the court’s interpretation of the rules, the sufficiency of the evidence and the constitutionality of rule 76a. We affirm.
Kyle Kepple, through his next friend, Kenneth Kepple, and others sued General Tire and Ford Motor Company alleging that tires manufactured by General Tire were defective causing tread separation and contributing to a rollover…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- General Tire, Inc. v. KeppleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Scolaro v. State Ex Rel. Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
- General Tire, Inc. v. KeppleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- General Tire, Inc. v. Kepple Ex Rel. Kepple, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996