Legal Opinion

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Marshall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1992No. D-1827PublishedCited by 229 opinions

1Per curiam

In this products liability suit, plaintiffs requested discovery of documents relating to the drug Prozac. Defendants filed a motion with the trial court seeking an order limiting the disclosure of certain of these documents under Rule 76a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, based upon a claim of trade secret. At the hearing on the motion, the application of Rule 76a to trade secrets was disputed, and the trial court declined to consider the merits of this claim.

Although the rule’s definition of “court records” excludes “discovery in cases originally initiated to preserve bona fide trade…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by229 opinions

  1. Barnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  2. In Re Blakeney, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  3. Safety-Kleen Corp. v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  4. In Re Ramirez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. O'DONNILEY v. Golden, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1993

224 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API