Legal Opinion
Salt Lake City Corp. v. Confer
Utah Supreme Court
Decided October 12, 1983No. 18707PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OAKS, Justice:
This is a case of first impression on the meaning of “handicap” in the Utah Anti-Discrimination Act, U.C.A., 1953, § 34-35-1, et seq. Finding that Salt Lake City Corporation had discriminated against Evelyn Confer, an applicant for employment, the Industrial Commission awarded her reinstatement plus lost wages for a period of twenty months (less her other earnings during that time) and attorney fees. On petition for a trial de novo, the district court granted summary judgment for the City. Confer pursues this appeal. We reverse and remand for further proceedings in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- E. E. Black, Ltd. v. MarshallDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
- Utah Department of Administrative Services v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Philip Bentivegna v. United States Department of Labor, and City of Los Angeles, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Commonwealth, Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Pledger v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Thomas Jasany v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Phillips v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Savage Industries, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- John Goodpaster v. Schwan's Home Service, Inc. and Todd Swanson, Individually and in His Corporate CapacitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.