E. E. Black, Ltd. v. Marshall
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SAMUEL P. KING, Chief Judge.
I. FACTS
This case of first impression involves the construction and interpretation of several sections of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. (1976 & Supp. III 1979), and appurtenant regulations. Section 503 of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 793 (Supp. III 1979) (as amended) reads in pertinent part:
Any contract in excess of $2,500 entered into by any Federal department or agency for the procurement of personal property and non — personal services (including construction) for the United States shall contain a provision requiring that, in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
3Cited by75 opinions
- Emily Snead v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company, a Delaware Corporation James McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Thomas Jasany v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Hughes v. BedsoleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Louis P. Forrisi v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Muin Mustafa v. Clark County School District, Edward Goldman, and Daniel HusseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.