Legal Opinion
Condon v. Haley
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided November 12, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2:14-4010-RMGPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RICHARD MARK GERGEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, a same sex couple seeking to marry, challenge South Carolina’s statutory and constitutional provisions prohibiting marriage between persons of the same sex. S.C.Code Ann. §§ 20-1-10, 20-1-15; S.C. Constitution Art. XVII § 15.1 Plaintiffs assert such provisions of South Carolina law infringe upon their fundamental right to marry, a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. (Dkt. No. 1). Plaintiffs argue that the Fourth Circuit’s recent…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Campaign for Southern Equality v. BryantDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014
- Bradacs v. HaleyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
- Barnes v. BraggDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
- Booze Pops LLC v. Real Estate Flipz LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.