Legal Opinion
Bradacs v. Haley
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided November 18, 2014No. Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-02351-JMCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
J. MICHELLE CHILDS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Katherine Bradacs (“Bradaes”) and Tracie Goodwin (“Goodwin”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Nimrata Randhawa Haley1, in her official capacity as Governor of South Carolina; and Alan M. Wilson (individually “Defendant”), in his official capacity as Attorney General, seeking “to challenge the constitutionality of South Carolina’s laws and constitutional provisions that deny legal recognition in South Carolina to the marriages of same-sex couples who are…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Booking.com B.V. v. MatalDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- Campaign for Southern Equality v. BryantDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014
- Ballard v. Thoennes (In re Thoennes)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- In re: DBMP LLC, Official Committee of Asbestos Personal Injury Claimants, and Sander L. Esserman, in his capacity as Legal Representative for Future Asbestos Claimants, each on behalf of the estate of DBMP LLC v. CertainTeed LLC, CertainTeed Holding Corporation, and Saint-Gobain CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2026