Vincent Young v. State of Mississippi
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
WILSON, J., CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:
¶ 20. The majority denies Young's claim on three grounds: (A) by virtue of his voluntary, negotiated plea agreement, Young waived his present challenge to the legality of his life sentence, ante at (¶¶ 6-8); (B) the Ex Post Facto Clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions apply to legislative acts, not judicial decisions, id. at (¶ 16); and (C) Young waived any due process challenge to the retroactive application of Bester v. State , 188 So.3d 526 (Miss. 2016), because he failed to brief that issue on appeal, id. at (¶¶ 17-18).
¶ 21. I…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rogers v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Richard Chapman v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- Stewart v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
- Cecil D. Slayton v. David Willingham, Larry Hignight, Bill Cully, City of Ardmore, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.