Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Vincent Young v. State of Mississippi

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided October 3, 2017No. 2016–CP–00542–COAPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

WILSON, J., CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:

¶ 20. The majority denies Young's claim on three grounds: (A) by virtue of his voluntary, negotiated plea agreement, Young waived his present challenge to the legality of his life sentence, ante at (¶¶ 6-8); (B) the Ex Post Facto Clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions apply to legislative acts, not judicial decisions, id. at (¶ 16); and (C) Young waived any due process challenge to the retroactive application of Bester v. State , 188 So.3d 526 (Miss. 2016), because he failed to brief that issue on appeal, id. at (¶¶ 17-18).

¶ 21. I…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Rogers v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Richard Chapman v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Stewart v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Cecil D. Slayton v. David Willingham, Larry Hignight, Bill Cully, City of Ardmore, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API