Legal Opinion
Cecil D. Slayton v. David Willingham, Larry Hignight, Bill Cully, City of Ardmore, Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 27, 1984No. 82-2109PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Cecil Slayton appeals from summary judgment in his civil rights suit. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 56. He brought this suit under section 1983 1 after pleading nolo contendere to a criminal charge in an Oklahoma state court. Mr. Slayton alleged that members of the Ardmore, Oklahoma police…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Andrews v. DelandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Jackie Ray Cline v. George W. Rogers, Individually and in His Capacity as Sheriff of McMinn County and McMinn County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Robert A. Borucki v. W. Michael Ryan, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Schowengerdt v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Sheila Vinson v. Campbell County Fiscal Court Nickie Hornsby and William StollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.