Legal Opinion

Kerrigan v. Magnum Entertainment, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 31, 1992No. Civ. L-91-1583PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LEGG, District Judge.

In this case the Court is called upon to decide whether Maryland recognizes a common law action for the alleged gender-motivated discharge of a pregnant woman whose employer, a small business, is not subject to federal and state civil rights statutes. Before the Court is a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint filed by defendant Magnum Entertainment, Inc. (“Magnum”). 1 For the following reasons, Magnum’s motion will be denied.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Plaintiff Fara Kerrigan (“Kerrigan”) is a former employee of defendant Magnum. Kerrigan claims that she was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Makovi v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Peggy Childers v. The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company, a New York Corporation David Charles Seal Ray N. Brown, M.D. Robert E. GerringCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Molesworth v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Roberts v. DudleyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Williamson v. GreeneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Burton v. Exam Center Industrial & General Medical Clinic, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API