Legal Opinion

Pye v. Hanzel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1937No. 31,317PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Contestant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial after findings of fact and conclusions of law deciding an election contest in favor of the contestee. Contestant and contestee were the only nominees and candidates for the office of judge of prohate court of Rice county at the general election held on November 3, 1936. The total number of ballots cast was 12,821, of which 826 were cast in blank for judge of probate and hence could not be and Avere not counted for either of the parties hereto. This includes exhibit 22, Avhich was not counted at all by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennington v. HareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Elwell v. ComstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. State v. SederstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Truelsen v. HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Bloedel v. CromwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Murray v. FloydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Hosford v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Aura v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Hanson v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Brewer v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API