Truelsen v. Hugo
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Election contest in the district court for St. Louis county. The contest was heard before Dibell, J., who found in favor of contestee, Hugo. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings contestant, Truelsen, appealed. Thereafter the contestee also appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Election contest for the office of mayor of Duluth. At the city election in Duluth on February 6, 1900, the parties to this contest were opposing candidates for mayor. Contestee, Hugo, was declared elected, whereupon contestant, Truelsen, instituted this contest, which, after trial, resulted in judgment confirming the right of contestee to the office. Contestant appeals.
Subsequent to this appeal, contestee also appealed for the purpose of having reviewed the rulings of the court below counting certain *74ballots for contestant, wliicb rulings could not be reviewed on contestant’s appeal. But, as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pennington v. HareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Parker v. OrrIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Vallier v. BrakkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Newton v. NewellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
3Cited by23 opinions
- Elwell v. ComstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Bell v. GannawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Wichelmann v. City of GlencoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Bloedel v. CromwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Pye v. HanzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.