Legal Opinion

Jessie v. Dash

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1960No. Appeals, 305 and 306PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This workmen’s compensation appeal is from the judgments of the Court of Common Pleas No. 2 of the County of Philadelphia affirming the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board in favor of the claimant, Celia Jessie, widow of William Jessie, deceased.

A review of the facts as found by the referee and affirmed by the board is set forth in the opinion of President Judge Carroll of the court below, as follows :

“William Jessie, deceased, had been employed by the defendant William Dash, trading as Dash Brothers, for a period of approximately four years as a handy man and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StalloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Nesbit v. Vandervort & CurrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Broad Street Trust Co. v. Heyl Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Icenhour v. Freedom Oil Wks. Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Gower v. MACKESSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cody v. S.K.F. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Reynolds Metals Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Scannella v. Salerno Importing Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Crain v. Small Tube Products, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. SKF Industries, Inc. v. CodyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API