Legal Opinion

Darrow v. Keystone 5, 10, 25, $1.00 Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1950No. Appeal, 15PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

Ben A. Darrow and Alexander Darrow, son and father respectively, along with a third person, Dr. J. H. Moran, sued the defendant company in this one action on three separate causes, one belonging to each of the named plaintiffs, for their respective damages allegedly due to the defendant’s negligence. Upon the defendant’s motion for judgment against the Darrows on the pleadings, the court below entered such judgment which necessarily meant, in procedural reality, two separate judgments, one against each of the Darrows. However, they took but this one appeal,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cannon v. BreschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Williams v. NotopolosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. McClintock & Irvine Co. v. Ætna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Jacob Siegel Co. v. Philadelphia Record Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. White v. LongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Galligan v. ArovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Pittsburgh Steel Co. v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Denlinger, Inc. v. DendlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API