Legal Opinion

Jacob Siegel Co. v. Philadelphia Record Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1943No. Appeal, 188PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

This is an action in trespass in which Jacob Siegel Company, tenant appellant, seeks to impose upon the Philadelphia Record Company, its landlord, liability for damages to appellant’s merchandise resulting from defective water pipes. The court below sustained a statutory demurrer to the statement of claim and entered judgment for the appellee.

Clause 16 of the lease relieves the lessor from all liability “by reason of any damage to any person, persons, or property in the demised premises . . . from water, rain or snow . . . from the pipes or plumbing work . . .…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Cannon v. BreschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Larsh v. Frank & Seder of Pittsburgh, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Musselman v. Sharswood Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Pittsburgh Steel Co. v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Boyd v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Leidy v. Deseret Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. McCarthy v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API