Legal Opinion
Marinchek v. Paige
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1989No. 17615PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
The trial court set aside a final judgment that had been entered against Gary Paige twenty-one months prior to his motion to vacate the judgment. Maria Rude Marinchek appeals. We reverse.
On August 31, 1984, Marinchek filed a complaint seeking collection of a debt and damages for fraud. The defendants were Paige and a general partnership in which Paige was a partner. Counsel appeared on behalf of both defendants, contending that any money transferred by Marinchek to them was a gift. Discovery was conducted, various pleadings and motions were filed, and two trial dates…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Solaroll Shade and Shutter Corp., Inc. v. Bio-Energy Systems, Inc., Broward Solar Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Marlin Brown v. Jon D. McCormick and Lyda N. McCormick His Wife, and Split Rock Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Parks v. ParksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. FerriNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Garbagni v. Metropolitan Investments, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Adams v. Para-Chem Southern, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Federated Towing & Recovery, LLC v. Praetorian InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Hall v. HallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.